Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
West Afr J Med ; 40(1): 90-96, 2023 Jan 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2218878

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Unsafe abortion remains a leading cause of maternal mortality and morbidity, especially in developing countries with restrictive abortion laws. Disease containment measures during the COVID-19 pandemic have reduced access to contraception and safe abortion care, potentially increasing rates of unintended pregnancies and unsafe abortion. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the morbidity and mortality burden of unsafe abortion before the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A six-year analytical retrospective study of unsafe abortion at the Federal Medical Centre, Lokoja, Nigeria. All case records of unsafe abortion managed within the study period were retrieved, and relevant data extracted using a purpose-designed proforma. Data obtained was analysed using the IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA). Associations between categorical independent and outcome variables were assessed using the Chi square test at 95% confidence level. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The prevalence of unsafe abortion was 8.6 per 1,000 deliveries. More than one-half (37, 52.9%) were medical abortions using misoprostol tablets. The mean age of the women was 23.15+ 3.96 years, and most of them were single (49, 70%), with primary/ secondary education (42, 60%), and of low socioeconomic status (67, 95.7%). Nearly one-half (33, 47.1%) had either never used any modern contraceptive (9, 12.9%) or only used emergency contraception (24, 34.3%). The predominant complications of unsafe abortion included retained product of conception (69, 98.6%), haemorrhagic shock (22,31.4%), and sepsis (19, 27.1%). There were two maternal deaths, giving a case fatality rate of 2.9%. CONCLUSION: Unsafe abortion remains a significant cause of maternal mortality and morbidity in our setting. Improving access to effective modern contraceptives and liberalizing our abortion laws may reduce maternal morbidity and mortality from unsafe abortion.


CONTEXTE: L'avortement à risque reste l'une des principales causes de mortalité et de morbidité maternelles, en particulier dans les pays en développement où les lois sur l'avortement sont restrictives. Les mesures de confinement de la maladie pendant la pandémie de COVID-19 ont réduit l'accès à la contraception et aux soins d'avortement sûrs, augmentant potentiellement les taux de grossesses non désirées et d'avortements à risque. OBJECTIF: Évaluer le fardeau de morbidité et de mortalité de l'avortement à risque avant la pandémie de COVID-19. METHODES: Une étude rétrospective analytique de six ans sur l'avortement à risque au Fédéral Médical Center, Lokoja, Nigeria. Tous les dossiers de tous les cas d'avortement à risque pris en charge au cours de la période d'étude ont été récupérés et les données pertinentes extraites à l'aide d'un formulaire conçu à cet effet. Les données obtenues ont été analysées à l'aide d'IBM SPSS Statistiques pour Windows, version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA). Les associations entre les variables indépendantes catégorielles et les variables de résultat ont été évaluées à l'aide du test du chi carré à un niveau de confiance de 95 %. Une valeur de p <0,05 était considérée comme statistiquement significative. RESULTATS: L'prévalence des avortements à risque était de 8,6 pour 1000 accouchements. Plus de la moitié (37, 52,9%) étaient des avortements médicamenteux utilisant comprimés de misoprostol. L'âge moyen des femmes était de 23,15+ 3,96 ans, et la plupart d'entre elles étaient célibataires (49, 70%), avec une éducation primaire/secondaire (42, 60%) et de statut socio-économique bas (67, 95,7%). Près de la moitié (33, 47,1%) n'avaient jamais utilisé de contraceptif moderne (9,12,9%) ou n'avaient utilisé qu'une contraception d'urgence (24, 34,3%). Les complications prédominantes comprenaient la rétention du produit de conception (69, 98,6 %), le choc hémorragique (22, 31,4 %) et la septicémie (19, 27,1 %). Il y a eu deux décès maternels, soit un taux de létalité de 2,9 %. CONCLUSION: L'avortement à risque reste une cause importante de mortalité et de morbidité maternelles dans notre contexte. L'amélioration de l'accès à des contraceptifs modernes efficaces et la libéralisation de nos lois sur l'avortement réduiront la morbidité et la mortalité maternelles dues à l'avortement à risque. Mots-clés: Planification familiale, Avortement illégal/criminel, morbidité et mortalité maternelles, Produit de la conception retenu, Besoin non satisfait.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced , COVID-19 , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Young Adult , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Abortion, Criminal , Tertiary Care Centers , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Abortion, Induced/adverse effects , Maternal Mortality
2.
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can ; 43(4): 182-190, 2023 04 12.
Article in English, French | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2205253

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has had widespread effects on adolescent mental health. However, little is known about support-seeking, unmet need and preferences for mental health care among adolescents. METHODS: The Youth Development Instrument (YDI) is a school-administered survey of adolescents (N = 1928, mean age = 17.1, SD = 0.3) across British Columbia, Canada. In this cohort, we assessed the characteristics of accessed mental health supports, prevalence of unmet need and preferences for in-person versus internet-based services. RESULTS: Overall, 40% of adolescents obtained support for mental health, while 41% experienced unmet need. The most commonly accessed supports were family doctors or pediatricians (23.1%) and adults at school (20.6%). The most preferred mode of mental health care was in-person counselling (72.4%), followed by chat-based services (15.0%), phone call (8.1%) and video call (4.4%). The adjusted prevalence of accessing support was elevated among adolescents with anxiety (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.10-1.51), those who used alcohol (1.14, 1.01-1.29), gender minorities (1.28, 1.03-1.58) and sexual minorities (1.28, 1.03-1.45). The adjusted prevalence of unmet need was elevated among adolescents with depression (1.90, 1.67-2.18), those with anxiety (1.78, 1.56-2.03), females (1.43, 1.31-1.58), gender minorities (1.45, 1.23-1.70) and sexual minorities (1.15, 1.07-1.23). CONCLUSION: Adolescents of gender or sexual minority status and those with anxiety were more likely than others to have discussed mental health concerns and also to have reported unmet need. The most common sources of support were primary health care providers and adults at school, while the most and least preferred modes of support were in-person and video call services, respectively.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mental Health Services , Adult , Female , Humans , Adolescent , Mental Health , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , British Columbia/epidemiology
3.
Lancet ; 400(10348):295-327, 2022.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-2121994

ABSTRACT

Background Meeting the contraceptive needs of women of reproductive age is beneficial for the health of women and children, and the economic and social empowerment of women. Higher rates of contraceptive coverage have been linked to the availability of a more diverse range of contraceptive methods. We present estimates of the contraceptive prevalence rate (CPR), modern contraceptive prevalence rate (mCPR), demand satisfied, and the method of contraception used for both partnered and unpartnered women for 5-year age groups in 204 countries and territories between 1970 and 2019. Methods We used 1162 population-based surveys capturing contraceptive use among women between 1970 and 2019, in which women of reproductive age (15-49 years) self-reported their, or their partner's, current use of contraception for family planning purposes. Spatiotemporal Gaussian process regression was used to generate estimates of the CPR, mCPR, demand satisfied, and method mix by age and marital status. We assessed how age-specific mCPR and demand satisfied changed with the Socio-demographic Index (SDI), a measure of social and economic development, using the meta-regression Bayesian, regularised, trimmed method from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study. Findings In 2019, 162middot9 million (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 155middot6-170middot2) women had unmet need for contraception, of whom 29middot3% (27middot9-30middot6) resided in sub-Saharan Africa and 27middot2% (24middot4-30middot3) resided in south Asia. Women aged 15-19 years (64middot8% [62middot9-66middot7]) and 20-24 years (71middot9% [68middot9-74middot2]) had the lowest rates of demand satisfied, with 43middot2 million (95% UI 39middot3-48middot0) women aged 15-24 years with unmet need in 2019. The mCPR and demand satisfied among women aged 15-19 years were substantially lower than among women aged 20-49 years at SDI values below 60 (on a 0-100 scale), but began to equalise as SDI increased above 60.Between 1970 and 2019, the global mCPR increased by 20middot1 percentage points (95% UI 18middot7-21middot6). During this time, traditional methods declined as a proportion of all contraceptive methods, whereas the use of implants, injections, female sterilisation, and condoms increased. Method mix differs substantially depending on age and geography, with the share of female sterilisation increasing with age and comprising more than 50% of methods in use in south Asia. In 28 countries, one method was used by more than 50% of users in 2019 Interpretation The dominance of one contraceptive method in some locations raises the question of whether family planning policies should aim to expand method mix or invest in making existing methods more accessible. Lower rates of demand satisfied among women aged 15-24 years are also concerning because unintended pregnancies before age 25 years can forestall or eliminate education and employment opportunities that lead to social and economic empowerment. Policy makers should strive to tailor family planning programmes to the preferences of the groups with the most need, while maintaining the programmes used by existing users. Copyright (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

4.
Ageing and Society ; : 1-24, 2022.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-2121282

ABSTRACT

In most Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, the government has to manage tension between growth in the need for long-term care (LTC) services for older people and significant public budget constraints. Not surprisingly, therefore, cost-containment policies are of increasing relevance. Nevertheless, despite the flourishing interest in the comparative literature in reforms and the sustainability of LTC policies, a scoping review of these measures has so far not been produced. This article aims to contribute to filling this gap. We present a typology of LTC cost-containment policies across the OECD. Cost-containment policies cluster in two areas according to their focus: demand-side policies, which reduce the actual chances of receiving LTC services and/or make them more expensive for users;and supply-side ones, which modify the provision of services. Furthermore, an indirect outcome of the review is that it allows an overview of potential negative implications of these policies. These negative implications can be grouped in two macro spheres relating to a worsening of the care arrangements for beneficiaries and to increased demand for individual/family resources, in both economic and time and effort terms. In the light of the expected profound impacts of the COVID-19 outbreak on all social security sectors in the medium and long term, this article provides a valuable tool for both academic and policy-making debate. It allows an analytical comprehension of cost-containment strategies adopted in LTC sectors linking them with the related impacts on beneficiaries and their families.

5.
J Adolesc Health ; 70(6): 985-988, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1783448

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Young adult anxiety/depression (mental health) symptoms have increased from prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. This study assessed young adult (aged 18-25 years) anxiety/depressive symptoms, mental health care utilization (prescription drug use, counseling, and/or either), and unmet counseling/therapy needs utilizing the national Household Pulse Survey data from June to July 2021. METHODS: Young adult (n = 2,809) rates and subgroup differences in mental health symptoms (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2 and/or Patient Health Questionnaire-2) were assessed, as were mental health care utilization and unmet counseling/therapy needs. RESULTS: In total, 48% of young adults had mental health symptoms. Among those, 39% received treatment and 36% reported unmet mental health counseling/therapy needs. DISCUSSION: These findings highlight young adults' ongoing mental health needs and low services receipt. Interventions and further research to reduce barriers to seeking and utilizing mental health care and to increase the capacity of providers to deliver culturally appropriate mental health care are needed.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mental Health Services , Adolescent , Adult , Anxiety/therapy , Anxiety Disorders/therapy , Depression/therapy , Humans , Pandemics , Young Adult
6.
Pan Afr Med J ; 40: 186, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1579762

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: the unmet need for family planning is a global health burden. The lockdown occasioned by the COVID-19 pandemic has reduced access to contraceptives, especially in the developing countries. This study examined the predictors of the unmet need for family planning during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown in Nigeria. METHODS: the study adopted a cross-sectional analytical survey design. A self-designed questionnaire was administered to 1,404 adult respondents aged 18 years and above. The data was generated through the use of online Google survey and analyzed with SPSS version 25. The results were presented using descriptive and logistic regression at p≤0.05. RESULTS: fourty-seven percent of the respondents were females and 58.8% were married. The four major reasons for non-access to contraceptive methods during the lockdown were: fear of visiting health facility (77.9%), locked drug/chemist stores (51.2%), the restriction of movement (47.6%) and a lack of access to health care providers (42.9%). Predictors of unmet need for family planning were: aged 26-33 (OR = 1.912, 95% CI: 1.02-3.55), married/cohabiters (OR = 3.693, 95% CI: 2.44-5.58), tertiary education (OR = 0.272, 95% CI: 0.13-0.54), Yoruba ethnicity (OR=1.642, 95% CI: 1.02-2.62), rural residence (OR = 0.554, 95% CI: 0.36-0.85) and 2-4 children born (OR = 3.873, 95% CI: 2.32-6.45). CONCLUSION: a significant proportion of Nigerians experienced an unmet need for family planning during the COVID-19 lockdown. Prioritizing the access to contraceptives during the pandemic would not only allow women and men to correctly plan childbirth, it also reduces maternal risks, poverty and undesirable fertility rates.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Family Planning Services , Adult , Child , Communicable Disease Control , Contraception , Contraception Behavior , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Nigeria/epidemiology , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
7.
J Fam Violence ; 37(7): 1027-1040, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1356023

ABSTRACT

This study examined elder mistreatment victims' experiences at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on their COVID-19 awareness and unmet needs. San Francisco Adult Protective Services (APS) caseworkers conducted phone interviews with clients or collaterals (client's family, trusted other, or service provider) to inquire about clients' awareness of COVID-19 and unmet needs. Nine-hundred-and-thirty-four (71%) of 1,313 APS' past clients or their collaterals were interviewed, with 741 (79%) responding positively to COVID-19-awareness questions, and 697 (75%) having no unmet needs. Binary logistic regression with Firth adjusted maximum likelihood estimation method revealed that older persons (p < .05), self-neglectors (p < .05), and victims of neglect (p < .05) were less aware of COVID-19. Unmet needs varied by mistreatment type. Victims of isolation were more likely to have medical needs (p < .05), while victims of emotional abuse were more likely to report loneliness (p < .001). Case notes reflected clients who were well-prepared for the pandemic, versus those who required additional assistance to follow preventative measures of the COVID-19 pandemic to stay home. Although the majority of San Francisco APS' past clients experienced no unmet needs at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the prolonged length and intensity of the pandemic could have exacerbated this vulnerable group's situation. Collaboration between service providers is key in assisting victims experiencing unmet needs to live safely in a public health crisis, especially underserved victims of specific ethnic backgrounds.

8.
Psychiatr Serv ; 73(2): 206-209, 2022 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1288491

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the prevalence and correlates of unmet need for mental health counseling among U.S. adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Data from the December 9-21, 2020, cross-sectional Household Pulse Survey (N=69,944) were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 12.8% of adults reported an unmet need for mental health counseling in the past month, including 25.2% of adults with a positive screen for depression or anxiety. Among adults with a positive screen, risk factors associated with an unmet need for mental health counseling included female sex, younger age, income below the federal poverty line, higher education, and household job loss during the pandemic, while protective factors included Asian and Black race. CONCLUSIONS: Over one-quarter of U.S. adults with a positive screen for depression or anxiety experienced an unmet need for mental health counseling during the pandemic. Policy makers should consider increasing funding for mental health services as part of pandemic relief legislation.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Adult , Anxiety/epidemiology , Counseling , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Mental Health , Prevalence , SARS-CoV-2
9.
J Foot Ankle Res ; 14(1): 46, 2021 Jun 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1286830

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, populations were advised to remain at home to control viral spread. Government-mandated restrictions on free movement affected individuals' engagement with physical activity, with reported increases leading to biopsychosocial health benefits and conversely increased sedentary behaviour leading to poorer health. Good foot health is key to enabling physical activity and maximal participation in activities of occupation and daily living. METHODS: A population-based cross-sectional study was performed, using a web-based platform. Quantitative and qualitative data were captured through responses to closed and open survey questions. Anybody with a foot health condition was eligible to participate in the online survey. Links were sent through professional networks, support groups and charities, using a snowball strategy to maximise participation. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-five respondents completed the survey. Most (n = 193, 75.69%) reported an ongoing foot pain or problem that had been present for 4 weeks or longer, whilst 49 respondents (19.22%) noted a new pain or problem. Pain was the most frequently reported symptom (n = 139, 54.51%), whilst change in appearance of the foot was also commonly reported (n = 122, 47.84%), often alongside the observable presence of swelling. Musculoskeletal foot symptoms were frequently reported (n = 123, 48%), and were significantly associated with reported reduced physical activity (X2 = 6.61, p = 0.010). Following qualitative analysis five themes and 11 subthemes emerged, informed by 49 independent codes. A central theme of lockdown disrupting support networks, both formal (healthcare providers) and informal (friends or family members) emerged. The 5 sub-themes were: 1. foot pain is a constant companion, 2. self-care, 3. 'cope or crumble' scenarios, 4. future intent to access healthcare and 5. reduced ability to undertake physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Pain was the most frequently reported foot problem during COVID-19 lockdown restriction. Lockdown restrictions disrupted support networks integral to maintaining foot health. Poor foot health impacted people's ability to remain physically active. Complaints previously considered relatively 'minor' such as support for skin and nail care, were found to be exacerbated by restricted support networks, leading to greater negative impact.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Exercise/psychology , Foot/pathology , Musculoskeletal Pain/epidemiology , Social Isolation/psychology , Activities of Daily Living/psychology , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , Communicable Disease Control/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Female , Government Regulation , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Pain/diagnosis , Patient Participation , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Sedentary Behavior , Self Care/psychology , Self-Help Groups/organization & administration , Surveys and Questionnaires
10.
Health Econ ; 30(7): 1711-1716, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1198378

ABSTRACT

Using monthly data from the Understanding Society (UKHLS) COVID-19 Survey we analyse the evolution of unmet need and assess how the UK health care system performed against the principle of horizontal equity in health care use during the first wave of COVID-19 wave. Unmet need was most evident for hospital care, and less pronounced for primary health services (non-emergency medical helplines, GP consultations, community pharmacist advice, over the counter medications and prescriptions). Despite this, there is no evidence that horizontal equity, with respect to income, was violated for NHS hospital outpatient and inpatient care during the first wave of the pandemic. There is evidence of pro-rich inequities in use of GP consultations, prescriptions and medical helplines at the peak of the first wave, but these were eliminated as the pandemic progressed. There are persistent pro-rich inequities for services that may relate to individuals' ability to pay (over the counter medications and advice from community pharmacists).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Delivery of Health Care , Health Equity , Health Services Needs and Demand , Income/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Surveys , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Socioeconomic Factors , United Kingdom
11.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care ; 25(4): 323-325, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-610753

ABSTRACT

The Novel Coronavirus disease that was first identified in Wuhan city of China in December 2019 has emerged as one of the fastest spreading pandemics all over the world affecting millions of people and causing millions of deaths worldwide. In an attempt to control its spread, countries have imposed local and national lockdowns, affecting many healthcare services, especially sexual and reproductive health services which are actually essential and lifesaving. In near future this will result in a large number of grave consequences including increased unmet need for modern contraceptives, unintended pregnancies, increased unsafe abortions, maternal and neonatal deaths and other harmful practices like female genital mutilation and child marriages in developing countries. The present short review focusses on such issues which will be dramatically increased depending on the duration of lockdowns and the time for which the sexual and reproductive health services will remain halted. It also reflects the need for considering reproductive health services as essential, allowing the people to avail these services without any fear and hence, saving many more lives which will be lost not due to coronavirus infection. Methodology: The data was searched from various governmental and non-governmental organisation sites including the World Health Organisation, United Nations, United Nations Population Fund, Guttmacher Institute and many PubMed indexed journals.


Subject(s)
Contraception , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Family Planning Services/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility , Health Services Needs and Demand , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pregnancy, Unwanted , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Female , Humans , Pandemics , Pregnancy , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL